Latest News - Gaddafi’s Female Bodyguards “Sweet 72″ Or “Killer Beauties” Went Through FGM |  |
- Gaddafi’s Female Bodyguards “Sweet 72″ Or “Killer Beauties” Went Through FGM
- Grand Prix Of India: Formula One India Grand Prix Tickets, Rates
- Sonam Shahid Lip Lock: Sonam Kapoor & Shahid Kapoor Kissing In Mausam
- Omer Bhatti, Michael Jackson’s Secret Son, A Result of One Night Stand in 1984
- Kim Kardashian Honeymoon: Kim Kardashian & Kris Humphries Honeymoon in European
- Jennifer Garner Pregnant: Jennifer Garner Is Pregnant With Third Child
- Kavya Madhavan Divorce – Malyalam Actress To Divorce Nischal Chandra
- Jack Layton Dead: Canada’s NDP Leader Jack Layton Dead From Cancer
- Read Jan Lokpal Bill Draft: Complete Draft Of Jan Lokpal Bill Online
- Jalila Essaidi-Bulletproof Skin: Jalila Essaidi Create Bulletproof Skin By Using Spider-Goat Silk
- K V Kamath Infosys: New Chairmen Of Infosys K V Kamath Takes Charge on Monday
| Gaddafi’s Female Bodyguards “Sweet 72″ Or “Killer Beauties” Went Through FGM Posted: 22 Aug 2011 10:28 PM PDT The feminine bodyguard contingent of Gaddafi who were renowned as “Sweet 72″ or “Killer Beauties” were compelled to undergo Female Genital Mutilation [FMG], which is furthermore renowned as Female Genital Cutting [FMC[, a scheme mostly performed in the African countries. It is currently described that All of his young women were said to pledge an oath that they would give their inhabits for him and it was asserted they not ever left his edge, evening or day, and he asserted they stay virgins. There was no lack of volunteers for what was glimpsed as a prestigious job. Total number of these "Sweet 72" or "Killer Beauties" were though not ever revealed, it was leaked one of Gaddafi's ex-girlfriends that, throughout every 8-hours, there was a contingent of 72 virgins, defending the Libyan autocrat. A exceptional teaching school was putting the new employees through a strong personal program and young women who did not fall out appeared as taught murderers, professionals in firearms and martial arts. Gaddafi made the last assortment and, regardless of his insistence that his sentries were chaste, rumors abounded that he was requiring their sexy favors. Gaddafi frequently utilised to spend night with his "Sweet 72" or "Killer Beauties" spending costly alcohol-dependent beverage and observing Hollywood activities movies. Female Genital Mutilation [FGM] is a heritage perform that begun in Africa roughly 2000 years ago. It is mainly a heritage perform, not a devout practice. But some beliefs manage encompass FGM as part of their practices. This perform is so well embedded into these cultures; it characterises constituents of these cultures. Female Genital Mutilation is the period utilised for exclusion of all or just part of the external components of the feminine genitalia. There are three diversity to this procedure. Sunna Circumcision – comprises of the exclusion of the prepuce(retractable bend of skin, or hood) and/or the tilt of the clitoris. Sunna in Arabic entails “tradition”. Clitoridectomy – comprises of the exclusion of the whole clitoris [prepuce and glands] and the exclusion of the adjacent labia. Infibulation [pharonic circumcision] – comprises of accomplishing a clitoridectomy [removal of all or part of the labia minora, the labia majora]. This is then stitched up permitting a little aperture to stay open to permit for urine and menstrual body-fluid to flow through. In Africa 85% of FGM situations comprise of Clitoridectomy and 15 per hundred of situations comprise of Infibulation. In some situations only the hood is removed. It is discovered that, Muammar Gaddafi was reluctant glimpsing his young women dropping in love or any kind of loving activities with a male. They were firmly under surveillance to double-check no one of the “Sweet 72″ or “Killer Beauties” of Gaddafi has sexy relatives with other men. In a number of situations, not less than 5 of the “Sweet 72″ or “Killer Beauties” of Gaddafi were slain on location by other constituents of this exceptional commando, when they were discovered having sex with any male constituents of the Gaddafi sentries or even kissing. In all those situations, the feminine sentries along with her male partners were directly killed. Muammar Gaddafi use to doze with 8 of the constituents of his “Sweet 72″ or “Killer Beauties” in his bedroom, two distributing bed with him, while residual six guarding. Inside Gaddafi’s bedroom, though most of them turned nude, they were habitually holding self-acting tools for fighting laden for any crisis period. By rotation, all of the constituents of “Sweet 72″ or “Killer Beauties” were having sexy actions with the Libyan autocrat. Gaddafi’s individual staffs were furtively trading sexy surgery both both Gaddafi and his young women as well as sexy playthings for example vibrators and dildos. Though the “Sweet 72″ or “Killer Beauties” were having sex with Gaddafi, no one of them were permitted to conceive child. FMG or FMC is a misdeed in the eyes of worldwide law. If Gaddafi is apprehended living, he should furthermore face allegations for this heinous misdeed beside numerous other crimes. Related posts:
|
| Grand Prix Of India: Formula One India Grand Prix Tickets, Rates Posted: 22 Aug 2011 09:52 PM PDT The Buddh International Circuit (BIC) is set to owner the first ever Indian Grand Prix rush between the 28th and 30th of October this year. The pathway is set and the infrastructure is well in place. A last signal off on the pathway is anticipated in the first week of September, although it has been verified previous by Bernie Ecclestone and now by the JP Group that everything is well on pathway so from the examines of it, there is not anything that is going to change from here onwards and annals is decisively in the making. The large-scale report although is the detail that permit sales have eventually begun. As of 20th August 2011, you can formally buy a permit to the Airtel Grand Prix of India. The permits to the rushes will be traded through www.bookmyshow.com which has set up an complicated online buying location where you can conclude precisely where you desire to be seated. A pathway brandish along with the seating placement can be examined online in alignment for you to make the best alternative possible. Bookmyshow.com furthermore proposes on setting up off-line kiosks in foremost towns over the homeland to retail Formula One tickets. The permits variety from Rs 2,500 for the natural stands to Rs 35,000 for the impressive stand. There are furthermore 55 business cartons that can be bought in alignment for corporates to amuse their own guests. Apart from this, JPSI has furthermore worked hard to confirm that visitors can reach at the rushes in substantial ease. There are many parking embayments and parking stickers can be bought in accelerate and the paths that lead to the rush pathway are all correctly assessed to double-check that you can navigate to your designated barrier without any hassles. There has been many of conjecture considering the charge of permits and as anticipated, they are not approaching cheap. However there is a allotment of activity exception from the rush and the whole bundle should certainly be worth your moolah. Ticket Pricelist: Related posts:
|
| Sonam Shahid Lip Lock: Sonam Kapoor & Shahid Kapoor Kissing In Mausam Posted: 22 Aug 2011 08:35 PM PDT There is no kissing view in Mausam.” Sonam Kapoor had said that. But Mumbai Mirror has just discovered out, that there is really a fervent lip-lock between the player and her co-star Shahid Kapoor in the said film. And the man who made this kiss likely was no one other than Shahid’s dad, the controller of the movie Mr Pankaj Kapur. Looks like the player who had one time refuted the reality of any such adopt in the task, couldn’t deny the director’s command. Initially when Pankaj Kapur had acquainted Sonam about the kiss, she had put her base down. Her denial had sparked off some genuine drama on the groups of the film. Kapur had even called up her dad Anil Kapoor in desperation. But the player denied to budge even then. She had even notified parts of the newspapers that there was no kissing view in the film. That although, is a thing of the past. Much like her days of not being too amicable with her co-star Shahid. With the thaw in their connection, even the kissing view appears to have worked itself out. In detail, when communicated Sonam notified Mumbai Mirror that she and Shahid manage have a kiss in Mausam. When inquired about her primary denial considering the view, she said, “Says who?” So was the view diluted? “No. Jitna hona chahiye tha, utna hi rakha gaya,” said Sonam. Sonam certainly appears to have had a change of heart. Mausam manufacturer Sheeta Talwar said, “Sonam is a truly unbelievable actress. She had a very snug formula with Pankaj and Shahid. If there were any aspersions whatsoever, they were cast apart throughout the course of the shoot.” Sonam will be the fourth heroine who Shahid is locking lips with- Kareena Kapoor (Jab We Met), Priyanka Chopra (Kaminey) and Anushka Sharma (Badmaash Company). Related posts:
|
| Omer Bhatti, Michael Jackson’s Secret Son, A Result of One Night Stand in 1984 Posted: 22 Aug 2011 08:17 PM PDT
Michael Jackson is believed to have a fourth child. Omer Bhatti, a 25-year-old Norwegian performer, is thought to be the ‘Billie Jean’ singer’s kid from a one night stand in 1984. Omer is now assumed to be looking for a DNA test to determine if he is a descendent of the ‘King of Pop’. The performer was also given a front row seat at Michael’s memorial service on July 7, sitting next to the star’s brothers and sisters, fuelling speculation he is related to thepop icon. Although Omer’s mother Pia and her husband Riz – who have both worked for Michael – refuse to talk about the star, Pia told Britain's The Sun newspaper “He was the ‘King of Pop’. But to us he was so much more.” Omer also lived at Jackson’s Neverland ranch home for several years from 1997, and video footage exists of him unwrapping presents with Michael and playing with a toddler, believed to be one of Michael’s other children – Prince Michael, 12, Paris, 11 and Prince Michael II, also known as ‘Blanket’, seven. The dancer was also at Neverland, in California, when police raided the property to investigate child molestation allegations in 2003. Omer first met Michael in Tunisia in 1996 aged 12, and impressed him with his dance moves. He has since performed with the ‘Smooth Criminal’ singer in public and worked as a Michael tribute act across the globe. The dancer’s stepfather Riz is believed to have worked as a driver for Jackson while his mother is thought to have been a nanny. No related posts. |
| Kim Kardashian Honeymoon: Kim Kardashian & Kris Humphries Honeymoon in European Posted: 22 Aug 2011 08:00 PM PDT Two days after their grandiose marriage on Saturday, Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries going off for a fast honeymoon. A source notifies Us Weekly the duo are travelling to a couple of distinct components of Europe. The newlyweds looked calm and at alleviate Monday after noon at LAX airport. “God is good,” Kardashian tweeted Sunday, next her and Humphries’ lavish nuptials. Although no total cost was freed for Kardashian’s commemorations, one insider notified Us the fete “was awkward.” “There were 100 crew constituents everywhere,” interprets the insider, “and persons kept deploring they nearly got strike by five camera friends universal they went.” But if the 30-year-old bride’s first around of commemorations weren’t flawless, there’s wish for the truth celebrity yet! Niche Media founder Jason Binn and marriage planner to to the stars Colin Cowie are throwing Kardashian and her NBA hubby, 26, a marriage party on the east coast. “[It's] a greeting to New York party,” Kardashian tweeted Monday of the August 31 event. Related posts:
|
| Jennifer Garner Pregnant: Jennifer Garner Is Pregnant With Third Child Posted: 22 Aug 2011 07:54 PM PDT Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck are getting prepared for another baby! The twosome, who are parents to two daughters – Violet, 5½, and Seraphina, 2½ – are “thrilled” to be anticipating their third progeny, they confirm to the Associated Press. Garner and Affleck, both 39, have each voiced of being hands-on parents. After Seraphina’s appearance, Garner said juggling portraying and motherhood provided her a “split personality.” “[I] seem like half my mind is somewhere additional all the time, but when the camera’s revolving, I drag it simultaneously and aim for two minutes,” she said at the time, “and then I kind of turn back to a ditz again.” Related posts:
|
| Kavya Madhavan Divorce – Malyalam Actress To Divorce Nischal Chandra Posted: 22 Aug 2011 08:17 AM PDT
The latest buzz which is overloading the net, is the divorce news of Kavya Madhavan, an actress of Malayam films. The lady recently got married to Nischal Chandra, on 5th of Feruary, 2009 and within 5 months, a divorce news is really shocking. As per the sources, she was being cheated by her husband and was not leading a happy marital life. After the marriage she was living in Kuwait with her husband but since one month, she has left Nischal and is living with her mom & dad. The news is from the local newspaper, which also reads that she is in discussion with the top divorce lawyers of Cochin. Still there is no official response or replys from Kavya. Is this a rumour or a sad truth, and if yes then why? What is the reason behind it? Any ways its really sad incident for the South Indian Film Industry and especially for the Malayalam film viewers. Kavya's last film released in Malayalam is Ee Pattanathil Bhootham. She also acted in Tamil Films also. Related posts: |
| Jack Layton Dead: Canada’s NDP Leader Jack Layton Dead From Cancer Posted: 22 Aug 2011 07:34 AM PDT Like some political Moses, Jack Layton directed his persons out of the wilds, only to pass away inside view of his own Promised Land. In the preface to his 2006 publication, “Speaking Out Louder,” Layton composed a route that turned out to be eerily prescient: “Oftentimes, life’s highs and lows are inextricably linked. That has absolutely occurred to me and, rarely, the ups and downs were effectively simultaneous.” In eight years as leader of the NDP he took his party to heady heights, but dropped himself to a tragic infection at the age of 61. The end came with a abrupt announcement. “We profoundly lament to announce you that the honourable Jack Layton, foremost of the New Democratic Party of Canada, passed away at 4:45 am today, Monday August 22,” said the declaration from his wife, Olivia Chow, and young children, Sarah and Michael. “He passed away peacefully at his dwelling enclosed by family and loved ones.” Funeral minutia have not yet been announced. Layton rebuilt his party, muted its interior squabbles, joined its fractious factions and weaned it from old-style dogma to present a face more palatable to middle-class voters. He starred in the most thriving election in the annals of his party and won the name of Opposition Leader, which had eluded his more storied predecessors. Layton hobbled over the hustings last jump, inclining on a cane contrary to the agony of a surgically fixed broken hip. He shrugged off the consequences of remedy for prostate cancer. His dogged campaigning as Le Bon Jack won him a most of the chairs in Quebec, a cherished but illusory aim for New Democrats for decades. He slew the Bloc Quebecois and glimpsed the long-dominant Liberal party decreased to a scruffy hulk. Layton was prepared for a new Canadian political alignment that would pit left contrary to right over the moribund Liberal middle. But the triumph cup was dashed from his lips by the attack of another, more brutal cancerous infection that trashed him to skin and skeletal components — and slain him just 16 weeks after election day. Layton went, in one short summer, from triumph to tragedy and left behind less a political legacy than a political question: What if? He was a man who conveyed government in his genes. A great-grandfather was a Father of Confederation. His grandfather, a Quebec provincial cabinet minister in a Union Nationale government. His dad, a Tory cabinet minister under Brian Mulroney. He was a believer. He made that clear in the first judgments of “Speaking Out Louder:” “Politics matters. Ideas matter. Democracy affairs, because all of us require to be adept to make a difference.” Layton was born in Montreal on July 18, 1950. He increased up in Hudson, Que., an Anglo community entire with a commemorated yacht club. It was a little village, but barely usual of small-town Quebec. He was a progeny of the placid Fifties in a well-off family in a well-to-do town. He was a teen and university scholar of the Sixties, with all that went with a ten years that has asserted the phrase “turbulent” as its singular descriptive. Layton took his BA at Montreal’s McGill University in the late 1960s, when radicalism blustered through campuses like a rigid gale. The rebellious vigour of the times directed him to political activism. He doffed the conservativism of his family and adopted socialism. “Events in the Sixties and Seventies were formative for me,” he composed in “Speaking Out Louder.” “My route increased out of the tumultuous days of the October Crisis.” He became an activist, canvasser and organizer for a community action in Montreal as a student. By the time he acquired his master’s stage at Toronto’s York University in 1972, his political genes had apparently activated. He had revised under Jim Laxer, a key number in the Waffle action that rocked the NDP at the time. Layton educated at Ryerson University in Toronto. But by the time he obtained his PhD in 1984, he had currently mostly left behind learned idea for community activism and then the practicalities of municipal politics. “I was snared on localized government and district engagement,” he wrote. First voted into agency in 1982, he assisted on Toronto and Metropolitan Toronto councils for 20 years, honing his gut feelings and abilities at the grade of retail politics. He was a political leader in the mould of a people’s tribune, with rolled-up sleeves, 14-hour days and seven-day weeks. Every hand was there to be surprised, every article was there to be learned, every windmill was there to be charged. His government were those of the poor, the homeless, the alienated, the disenfranchised. He assisted as vice-chair of Toronto Hydro, seating of the Toronto Board of Health and leader of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. He two times ran federally and lost. Layton’s first wedding ceremony to high-school sweetheart Sally Halford, which had made two young children, completed in 1983. He would finally group up with Olivia Chow, another municipal power-broker. Together they would become the go-to twosome of the left in Toronto politics. They travelled a tandem two wheeler along the beachfront, amused, directed rallies, marched in parades, ran for agency and won. Chow would pursue Layton into the House of Commons in 2006. And she would be adjacent him in the dark summer of 2011. In his increase, Layton profited a status as a brash, hard-hitting, even abrasive figure. On a journey to Calgary for a gathering of the federation of municipalities, he increased localized hackles with dismissive remarks about the town, its appetite for new structures at the cost of older properties and even its ritzy new town hall. There was an outcry in the localized newspapers and Art Eggleton, then head of Toronto, dispatched his own apology for Layton’s comments. He furthermore profited a status as a expert of the political stunt and the over-the-top comment. Some jested that the most unsafe location to be round town auditorium was between Layton and a microphone, where one might get trampled. Rightly or incorrectly, the likeness of a blaring lout yelling into the microphone from the left edge of any topic clung to him after he won the NDP authority in 2003. It was a authority challenge that pitted Layton and the trendy new left contrary to Bill Blaikie and the customary, Prairie populist wing. Blaikie was a United Church minister in the best customs of NDP and CCF champions of old. Layton was an learned and a firebrand. Blaikie was a Manitoban, Layton was from Toronto, font of all bad for numerous Canadians, particularly westerners. Layton won on the first ballot and went into renovation mode. He started to rebuild and re-brand his party. He was a persons individual whose BlackBerry kept him connected to hundreds of organizers, fund-raisers, recruiters and principle wonks. He worked through repasts and holidays, impelling himself and his goals. He toned down the untamed rhetoric, whereas he increased an uproar in the 2004 election crusade by accusing then-prime minister Paul Martin of blame for the killings of homeless persons because he failed to make inexpensive housing. Despite that, Layton won his Toronto-Danforth chair in Parliament in 2004, an election that left Martin’s Liberals with a few government. The NDP increased its chair total to 19 from 13. It was a start. Layton criss-crossed the homeland to lift the party profile and in managing so, became the public face of the NDP. The trademark grin, the brush moustache, the earnest optimism, the trademark head tilt were the devices of his trade. The hellfire rhetoric cooled. This was sensible Jack, hopeful Jack, the Jack of the kitchen table, not the road corner. The set about appeared to hit a chord with normal folk. In 2006, Layton’s crusade made 29 chairs, but increased its ballot to 2.59 million. Momentum was building. On May 2, about 4.5 million persons cast ballots for the NDP, giving the party 103 chairs — 59 from Quebec — and producing Layton foremost of the Official Opposition. Just over two months subsequent, looking fair and gaunt, he called a report seminar to state he was pain from another, unspecified cancer and he would for the time being step down as party leader. Nycole Turmel, rookie MP and veteran work foremost, took over in the interim. “I have initiated thee to glimpse it with thine eyes, but thou shalt not proceed over thither. So Moses the domestic of the Lord past away there in the land of Moab, as asserted by the phrase of the Lord.” Related posts:
|
| Read Jan Lokpal Bill Draft: Complete Draft Of Jan Lokpal Bill Online Posted: 22 Aug 2011 06:22 AM PDT An act to create effective anti-corruption and grievance redressal systems at centre so that effective deterrent is created against corruption and to provide effective protection to whistleblowers. 1. Short title and commencement:- (1) This Act may be called the Jan Lokpal Act, 2010. (2) It shall come into force on the one hundred and twentieth day of its enactment. 2. Definitions:- In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (1) "Action" means any action taken by a public servant in the discharge of his functions as such public servant and includes decision, recommendation or finding or in any other manner and includes willful failure or omission to act and all other expressions relating to such action shall be construed accordingly; (2) "Allegation" in relation to a public servant includes any affirmation that such public servant- (a) has indulged in misconduct, if he is a government servant; (b) has indulged in corruption (3) "complaint" includes any grievance or allegation or a request by whistleblower for protection and appropriate action. (4) "corruption" includes anything made punishable under Chapter IX of the Indian Penal Code or under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Provided that if any person obtains any benefit from the government by violating any laws or rules, that person along with the public servants who directly or indirectly helped that person obtain those benefits, shall be deemed to have indulged in corruption. (5) "Government" or "Central Government" means Government of India. (6) "Government Servant" means any person who is or was any time appointed to a civil service or post in connection with the affairs of the Central Government or High Courts or Supreme Court either on deputation or permanent or temporary or on contractual employment but would not include the judges. (7) "grievance" means a claim by a person that he could not get satisfactory redressal according to citizen's charter and despite approaching Public Grievance Officer of that Department; (8) "Lokpal" means a. Benches constituted under this Act and performing their functions as laid down under (8A) "Minor penalty" and Major penalty" shall mean the same as defined in CCS Conduct Rules. (9) "Misconduct" means misconduct as defined in relevant Conduct Rules and which has vigilance angle. (10) “public authority” means any authority or body or institution of self- government established or constituted— a. by or under the Constitution; b. by any other law made by Parliament; c. by notification issued or order made by the Government, and includes any body owned, controlled or substantially financed by the Government; (11) "Public servant" means a person who is or was at any time,- (a) the Prime Minister; (b) a Minister; (c) a Member of Parliament; (d) Judges of High Courts and Supreme Courts; (e) a Government servant; (f) the Chairman or Vice-Chairman (by whatever name called) or a member of a local authority in the control of the Central Government or a statutory body or corporation established by or under any law of the Parliament of India, including a co-operative society, or a Government Company within the meaning of section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 and members of any Committee or Board, statutory or non- statutory, constituted by the Government; (g) includes all those who are declared as "public servants" in section 2(c) of Prevention of (h) Such other authorities as the Central Government may, by notification, from time to (12) "Vigilance angle" includes – (a) All acts of corruption (13) "Whistleblower" is any person, who faces the threat of (a) professional harm, including but not limited to illegitimate transfer, denial of promotion, denial 3. Establishment of the institution of Lokpal and appointment of Lokpal: (1) There shall be an institution known as Lokpal which shall consist of one Chairperson and ten (2) The Chairperson and members of Lokpal shall be selected in such manner as laid down in this (3) A person appointed as Chairperson or member of Lokpal shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, an oath or affirmation in the form as prescribed. (4) The Government shall appoint the Chairperson and members of the first Lokpal and set up the institution with all its logistics and assets within six months of enactment of this Act. (5) The Government shall fill up a vacancy of the Chairperson or a member caused due to Chairperson and Members of Lokpal 4. The Chairperson and members of Lokpal not to have held certain offices- The Chairperson and members of Lokpal shall not be serving member of either the Parliament or the Legislature of any State and shall not hold any office or trust of profit (other than the office as Chairperson or member) or carry on any business or practice any profession and accordingly, before he enters upon his office, a person appointed as the Chairperson or member of Lokpal shall- (i) if he holds any office of trust or profit, resign from such office; or (ii) if he is carrying on any business, sever his connection with the conduct and (iii) if he is practicing any profession, suspend practice of such profession. (iv) If he is associated directly or indirectly with any other activity, which is likely cause conflict of interest in the performance of his duties in Lokpal, he should suspend his association with that activity. Provided that if even after the suspension, the earlier association of that person with such activity is likely to adversely affect his performance at Lokpal, that person shall not be appointed as a member or Chairperson of Lokpal. 5. Term of office and other conditions of service of Lokpal– (1) A person appointed as the Chairperson or member of Lokpal shall hold office for a term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office or upto the age of 70 years, whichever is earlier; (a) the Chairperson or member of Lokpal may, by writing under his hand addressed to the (b) the Chairperson or member may be removed from office in the manner provided in (2) There shall be paid to the Chairperson and each member every month a salary equal to that of the Chief Justice of India and that of the judge of the Supreme Court respectively; (3) The allowances and pension payable to and other conditions of service of the Chairperson or a member shall be such as may be prescribed; (4) The administrative expenses of the office of the Lokpal including all salaries, allowances and pensions payable to or in respect of persons serving in that office, shall be charged on the Consolidated Fund of India. (5) There shall be a separate fund by the name of "Lokpal fund" in which penalties/fines imposed by the Lokpal shall be deposited and in which 10% of the loss of Public Money recovered under section 19 of this Act shall also be deposited by the Government. Disposal of such fund shall be completely at the discretion of the Lokpal and such fund shall be used only for enhancement/upgradation/extension of the infrastructure of Lokpal. (6) The Chairperson and members of Lokpal shall not be eligible for appointment to any position in Government of India or Government of any state or any such body which is funded by any of the governments or for contesting elections to Parliament, state legislatures or local bodies, if he has ever held the position of the Chairperson or a member for any period after demitting their office. A member could be appointed as a chairperson, provided that the total tenure both as member and as chairperson 6. Appointment of the Chairperson and members: 1. The Chairperson and members shall be appointed by the President on the recommendation of a selection committee. 2. The following shall not be eligible to become Chairperson or Member of Lokpal: (a) Any person, who is not a citizen of India (b) Any person, who was ever chargesheeted for any offence under IPC or PC Act or any other (c) Any person, who is less than 40 years in age. (d) Any person, who was in the service of any government and has remitted office within the last two years, either by way of resignation or retirement. 3. At least four members of Lokpal shall have legal background. Not more than two members, Explanation: "Legal Background" means that the person should have held a judicial office in the territory of India for at least ten years or has been an advocate in High Court or Supreme Court for at least fifteen years. 4. The members and Chairperson should have unimpeachable integrity and should have 5. A selection committee consisting of the following shall be set up: a. The Prime Minister of India 6. The Vice President shall act as the Chairperson of the selection committee. 7. There shall be a search committee consisting of ten members. 8. Members of search committee shall be selected in the following manner: a. The selection committee shall select five members of search committee from the former Comptroller and Auditor Generals of India and Chief Election Commissioners of India. b) Any person who has either joined any political party after retirement or has had strong affiliations to any political party c) Any person who is still in the service of the government in any capacity d) Any person who took up a government assignment after retirement barring those assignments which are reserved for the post from which he has retired. b. The five members selected above shall nominate five members from civil society. 9. The search committee shall invite recommendations from such class of people or such individuals as it deems fit. The recommendations should, interalia, contain the following details: a. Personal details of the candidate being recommended b. Details of any allegations faced by the candidate under any law or any allegations of moral turpitude in the past? c. Details of his work against corruption in the past with documentary evidence. d. Evidence from his past, if any, to show that he is a fiercely independent person and cannot be influenced. e. Any other material that the search committee decides. 10. The following selection process shall be followed: a. The list of candidates received above along with their details received in the format mentioned above shall be displayed on a website. b. Public feedback shall be invited on these names. c. The search committee may decide to use any means to collect more information about the background and past achievements of these candidates. d. All the material obtained so far about the candidates shall be made available to each member of the search committee in advance. The members shall make their own assessment of each candidate. e. The search committee shall meet and discuss the material so received about each candidate. The selections shall be made preferably through consensus. f. Search committee shall recommend three times the names as there are vacancies to the selection committee. g. Selection committee shall select such number of candidates as there are vacancies to the Prime Minister. The selections shall be made preferably through consensus. h. All meetings of search committee and selection shall be video recorded and shall be made public. 11. The Prime Minister shall recommend the names finalized by the selection committee to the President immediately, who shall order such appointments within a month of receipt of the same. 12. If any of the members of the selection committee retires while a selection process is going on, that member will continue on the selection committee till the end of that process. 7. Removal of Chairperson or members- (1) The Chairperson or any member shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President on one or more of the following grounds: a. Proved misbehavior (3) The following process shall be followed in respect of petitions for the removal of any member or Chairperson of Lokpal: (a) Any person may move a petition before the Supreme Court seeking removal of one or more (b) The Supreme Court will hear the matter on receipt of such petition and may take one or (i) order an investigation by a Special Investigation Team appointed by the Supreme Court, if a prima facie case is made out and if the matter cannot be judged based on affidavits of the parties. The Special Investigation Team shall submit its report within three months. (ii) Pending investigations by a Special Investigation Team under sub-clause (i), order withdrawal of a part or complete work from that member. (iii) dismiss the petition if no case is made out (iv) if the grounds are proved, recommend to the President for removal of the said member or Chairperson (v) direct registration and investigation of cases with appropriate agencies, if there is a prima facie case of commission of an offence punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act or any other law. (e) The bench shall be constituted by a panel of five seniormost judges of the Supreme Court. (f) The Supreme Court shall not dismiss such petitions in liminae. (g) If the Supreme Court concludes that the petition has been made with mischievous or malafide motives, the Court may order imposition of fine or imprisonment upto one year against the complainant. (h) On receipt of a recommendation from the Supreme Court under clause (b)(iv) supra, the Prime Minister shall immediately recommend the removal of the member(s) or Chairperson of Lokpal to the President, who shall order the removal of the said member(s) or Chairperson within a month of receipt of the same. Powers and Functions of Lokpal 8. Functions of Lokpal: (1) the Lokpal shall be responsible for receiving: (2) The Lokpal, after getting such enquiries and investigations done as it deems fit, may take one or more of the following actions: a. Close the case, if prima facie, the complaint is not made out, or (4) Issue such directions, as are necessary, from time to time, to appropriate authorities so as to make such changes in their work practices, administration or other systems so as to reduce the scope and possibility for corruption, misconduct, public grievances and whistleblower victimization. (5) Orders made by Lokpal under sub-section (2)(c) of this section shall be binding on the government and the government shall implement it within a week of receipt of that order. (6) Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act shall be deleted. Section 6A of Delhi Special Police Establishment Act shall not be applicable to the proceedings under this Act. (7) Section 197 of CrPC shall not apply to any proceedings under this Act. All permissions, which need to be sought for initiating investigations or for initiating prosecutions under any Act shall be deemed to have been granted once Lokpal grants such permissions. 9. (2) The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, relating to search and seizure shall apply, so far as may be, to searches and seizures under sub-section (1). (3) A warrant issued under sub-section (1) shall for all purposes, be deemed to be a warrant issued by a court under section 93 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 10. Evidence - (1) Subject to the provisions of this section, for the purpose of any investigation (including (2) For the purpose of any such investigation (including the preliminary inquiry) the Lokpal shall (3) Any proceeding before the Lokpal shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding with in the 11. Reports of Lokpal, etc. (1) The Chairperson of Lokpal shall present annually a consolidated report in prescribed format on its performance to the President. (2) On receipt of the annual report, the President shall cause a copy thereof together with an (3) The Lokpal shall publish every month on its website the list of cases disposed with brief details of each such case, outcome and action taken or proposed to be taken in that case. It shall also publish lists of all cases received by the Lokpal during the previous month, cases disposed and cases which are pending. 12. Lokpal to be a deemed police officer: (1) For the purposes of section 36 of Criminal Procedure Code, the Chairperson, members of Lokpal and the officers in investigation wing of Lokpal shall be deemed to be police officers. (2) While investigating any offence under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, they shall be competent to investigate any offence under any other law in the same case. 13. Powers in case of non-compliance of orders: (1) Each order of the Lokpal shall clearly specify the names of the officials who are required to execute that order, the manner in which it should be executed and the time period within which that order should be complied with. (2) If the order is not complied with within the time or in the manner directed, the Lokpal may decide to impose a fine on the officials responsible for the non-compliance of its orders. (3) The Drawing and Disbursing Officer of that Department shall be directed to deduct such amount of fine as is clearly specified by the Lokpal in its order made in sub-section (2) from the salaries of the officers specified in the order. (4) In order to get its orders complied with, the Lokpal shall have, and exercise the same jurisdiction powers and authority in respect of contempt of itself as a High court has and may exercise, and, for this purpose, the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Central Act 70 of 1971) shall have the effect subject to the modification that the references therein to the High Court shall be construed as including a reference to the Lokpal. 13A. Special Judges under section 4 of Prevention of Corruption Act: (1) On an annual basis, the Lokpal shall make an assessment of the number of Special Judges required under section 4 of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 in each area and the Government shall appoint such number of Judges within three months of the receipt of such recommendation. Provided that the Lokpal shall recommend such number of Special Judges so that trial in each case under this Act is completed within a year. (2) Before making any fresh appointments, the Government shall consult the Lokpal on the procedure to be followed in selection to ensure the integrity of the candidates selected. The Government shall implement such recommendations. 13B. Issue of Letter Rogatory: A bench of the Lokpal shall have powers to issue Letters Rogatory in any case pending with the Lokpal. 13C. Powers under Indian Telegraph Act: An appropriate bench of Lokpal shall be deemed to be Functioning of Lokpal 14. Functioning of Lokpal: (1) The Chairperson shall be responsible for the overall administration and (2) All policy level decisions including formulation of regulations, developing internal systems for the functioning of Lokpal, assigning functions to various officials in Lokpal, delegation of powers to various functionaries in Lokpal etc shall be taken by the Chairperson and the members collectively as a body. (3) The Chairperson shall have an annual meeting with the Prime Minister to assess the needs of Lokpal for finances and manpower. Lokpal shall be provided resources by the Government on the basis of outcome of this meeting. (3A) The expenditure so decided shall be charged to Consolidated Fund of India. (3B) The Chairperson and its members of Lokpal shall take all steps to ensure the integrity of its (3C) The Chairperson and members of Lokpal shall be responsible for and shall be competent to take all steps to ensure that the time limits provided in this Act are adhered to strictly. (3D) Lokpal shall be completely independent of the government in all matters including administrative, financial and functional. (4) Lokpal shall function in benches of three or more members. Benches shall be constituted randomly and cases shall be assigned to them randomly by computer. Each bench shall consist of at least one member with legal background. (5) Such benches shall be responsible for (6) The Lokpal may decide to initiate investigations into any case suo motu. (7) The decision to initiate investigation or prosecution against any member of the Cabinet shall be taken by full bench of Lokpal. (8) Certain matters, as provided under this Act shall be dealt by the full bench of Lokpal, which shall consist of at least seven members. (9) Minutes and records of meetings of Lokpal shall be made public. 15. Making a complaint to the Lokpal: (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, any person may make a complaint under this Act to the Lokpal. Provided that in case of a grievance, if the person aggrieved is dead or for any reason, unable to (2) A complaint could be on a plain paper but should contain all such details as prescribed by Lokpal. (2A) After its annual report has been presented in the Parliament, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India shall forward all such cases, which constitute an allegation under this Act, to the Lokpal and Lokpal shall act on them as per provisions of this Act. (3) On receipt of a complaint, the Lokpal shall decide whether it is an allegation or a grievance or a request for whistleblower protection or a mixture of two or more of these. (4) Every complaint shall have to be compulsorily disposed of by the Lokpal. 16. Matters which may be investigated by the Lokpal– Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Lokpal may investigate any action which is taken by or with the general or specific approval of a public servant where a complaint involving a grievance or an allegation is made in respect of such action. Provided that the Lokpal may also investigate such action suo moto or if it is referred to it by the 17. Matters not subject to investigation:- (1) The Lokpal shall not conduct any investigation under this (i) if the complainant has or had, any remedy by way of appeal, revision, review or any other (ii) Taken by a judicial or quasi-judicial body, unless the complainant alleges malafides (iii) If the substance of the entire grievance is pending before any court or quasi-judicial body (iv) any grievance where there is inordinate and inexplicable delay in agitating it. (2) Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the Lokpal to investigate any action which is taken by or with the approval of the Presiding Officer of either House of Parliament. (3) Nothing in this section shall bar Lokpal from entertaining a complaint making an allegation of 18. Provisions relating to complaints and investigations- (i) (a) The Lokpal, on receipt of a complaint in the nature of an allegation or a grievance or a Provided that if any case is closed, all documents related thereto shall thereafter be Provided further that no complaint of allegation shall be rejected on the basis of the Provided further that all hearings before Lokpal shall be video recorded and shall be (b) The procedure for preliminary enquiry of a complaint shall be such as the Lokpal deems Provided that the preliminary enquiry should be completed and a decision taken whether (c) No anonymous complaint shall be entertained under this Act. The Complainant will have (ii) Where the Lokpal proposes, either directly or after making preliminary inquiry, to conduct (b) at appropriate stage of investigations or in the end, it shall forward a copy of the (c) shall afford to such public servant and the complainant an opportunity to offer Provided that such hearing shall be held in public, except in rare circumstances, to be (iii) The conduct of an investigation under this Act against a public servant in respect of any (iv) If, during the course of a preliminary inquiry or investigation under this Act, the Lokpal is (v) The Lokpal, either during the course of investigations, if it is satisfied that prosecution is (vi) If during the course of investigation or enquiry into a complaint, the Lokpal feels that (vii) The Lokpal may, at any stage of inquiry or investigation under this Act, direct through an (a) to safeguard wastage or damage of public property or public revenue by the (b) to prevent further acts of misconduct by the public servant; (c) to prevent the public servant from secreting the assets allegedly acquired by him by The public authority shall either comply with or reject the recommendations of Lokpal (viii) Where after investigation into a complaint, the Lokpal is satisfied that the complaint Provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply to the Prime Minister. (ix) All records and information of Lokpal shall be public and shall be accessible under Right to Recovery of Loss to the Government and punishments 19. Recovery of loss to the Government: When a person is convicted of an offence under the 19A. Punishments for offences: For offences mentioned in Chapter III of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the proviso to section 2(4) of this Act and section 28A of this Act, the punishment shall not be less than one year of rigorous imprisonment and may extend upto life imprisonment. Provided that the punishment shall be more severe if the accused is higher in rank. Dealing with complaints against judges of High Courts or Supreme Court 19B. Receiving and disposing complaints against Judges of High Courts or Supreme Court: (1) Any complaint against any Judge of a High Court or Supreme Court shall be dealt only by the office of the Chairperson of Lokpal. (2) Each such complaint shall be subjected to a preliminary screening, which shall determine whether prima facie evidence exists of an offence under Prevention of Corruption Act. The screening shall be done by a member of Lokpal, who shall then present his findings to a full bench of Lokpal. Provided that such full bench shall have at least three legal members. (3) A case shall not be registered without the approval of a full bench of Lokpal with majority of (4) Such case shall be investigated by a special team headed by an officer not below the rank of a (5) A decision whether to initiate prosecution shall be taken by a full bench of Lokpal with majority of members with legal background. Whistleblower protection 20. Protection of Whistleblower: (1) A whistleblower may seek the protection of the Lokpal if he has (2) On receiving such a complaint, Lokpal shall take following steps: (a) Professional victimization: If after conducting appropriate enquiries, the Lokpal feels that (b) If a whistleblower complains that he has been victimized professionally on account of making Provided that for clause (a) the Lokpal may, but for clause (b) the Lokpal shall, also issue Provided further that no such penalties shall be imposed without giving an opportunity (c) Threat of physical victimization: Lokpal shall conduct appropriate enquiries and if it feels that (d) If a person complains that he has already been physically assaulted on account of making an (da) If a whistleblower alleges that police or any other authority has registered or initiated any (db) In case of threat of physical victimization or if any person has been assaulted, that person, (dc) Lokpal may delegate the responsibility of providing protection to whistleblowers to upto (dd) If, after making a complaint to the Lokpal, any person is still assaulted, the concerned (e) If the whistleblower has alleged an act punishable under Prevention of Corruption Act, then (f) If the whistleblower has alleged an act punishable under any law other than the Prevention (g) Lokpal shall have the powers to issue directions to appropriate agencies in the cases covered (h) Whistleblowers, who face threat of physical victimization or are actually assaulted may (3) If any complainant requests that his identity should be kept secret, Lokpal shall ensure the same. Lokpal shall prescribe detailed procedures on how such complaints shall be dealt with. (4) Lokpal shall Issue orders to the Public Authorities to make necessary changes in their policies and practices to prevent recurrence of victimization. (5) Lokpal shall make appropriate rules for the receipt and disposal of complaints from whistleblowers. Grievance Redressal Systems 21. Citizens' Charters: (1) Each public authority shall be responsible for ensuring the preparation and (2) Every Citizens Charter shall enumerate the commitments of the respective public authority to the citizens, officer responsible for meeting each such commitment and the time limit with in which the commitment shall be met. (3) Each public authority shall designate an official called Public Grievance Redressal Officer, whom a complainant should approach for any violation of the Citizens Charter. Provided further that the Public Grievance Redressal Officer shall either be Head of that Department or an officer not more than one rank below him but if that station does not have a Head of Department in any station, the seniormost officer in that station shall be appointed as the Public Grievance Redressal Officer. (4) Every public authority shall review and revise its Citizens Charter at least once every year through a process of public consultation to be held in the presence of Chief Vigilance Officer in that public authority. (5) Lokpal may direct any public authority to make such changes in their citizens' charter as are Provided that such changes shall have to be approved by at least a three member bench of Lokpal. Provided further than such changes should not increase the existing time limits or reduce the number of items in citizen's charter. 21A. Receipt and disposal of Grievances: (1) The Chief Vigilance Officer of any public authority shall (2)If a citizen fails to receive satisfactory redressal to his grievance within a month of making a complaint to Public Grievance Redressal Officer, can make a complaint to Appellate Grievance Officer. Provided that if Appellate Grievance Officer feels that considering the gravity or urgency of the (3) If the complaint does not relate to an issue mentioned in Citizen's Charter of that public authority, the Appellate Grievance Officer, within a month of receipt of complaint, pass an order either rejecting the grievance or directing the public authority to redress the grievance in the manner and within such time, as is mentioned in the order. Provided that no grievance shall be rejected without giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the complainant. (4) A complaint to the Appellate Grievance Officer shall be deemed to have a vigilance angle if any of the following two conditions are satisfied: (i) for issues mentioned in citizen's charter, if a citizen fails to get satisfactory redressal from (5) Each case, as mentioned in sub-section (4) of this section, shall be dealt in the following manner: (6) The Officers mentioned in the order made under clause (i) of sub-section (5) of this section shall be required to show cause that they acted in good faith and did not have corrupt motives. If they fail to do so, the Appellate Grievance Officer shall proceed to recommend penalties against the said officers under CCS Conduct Rules. 21B. Annual Integrity Audit: Lokpal shall conduct annual integrity audit of each department as per guidelines to be made in this behalf by the Lokpal from time to time. Imposition of major and minor penalties 21B. Allegations of misconduct shall be received and enquired by vigilance officers. 21C. Allegations of misconduct and public grievances with deemed vigilance angle under section 21A shall be dealt in the following manner: (1) The vigilance officer shall conduct an enquiry into each such case within three months of its (2) Within a fortnight of receipt of report, the Chief Vigilance Officer shall constitute a three (4) The bench shall hold hearings on day to day basis and pass an order either imposing one or Provided that such orders shall be passed within a month of constitution of the bench. (5) An appeal shall lie against the order of the bench before the Chief Vigilance officer, who shall Employees and staff and authorities in Lokpal 22. Chief Vigilance Officer: (2) He shall not be from the same public authority. (3) He shall be a person of impeccable integrity and ability to take proactive measures against (4) He shall be responsible for accepting complaints against any public authority and shall transfer the complaints related to other public authorities within two days of receipt. (5) He shall be responsible for carrying out all such responsibilities as assigned to him from time to time by Lokpal including dealing with complaints in the manner as laid down by Lokpal from time to time. Provided that the complaints which require investigations under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 shall be transferred to the Investigative wing of Lokpal. Provided further that the complaints, other than grievances, against officers of the level of Joint (6) All the grievances shall be received and disposed by Chief Vigilance Officer on behalf of Lokpal, if the citizen fails to get satisfactory redressal from Public Grievance Officer under section 21 of this Act. (7) Such number of Vigilance Officers shall be appointed under the Chief Vigilance Officer as are decided by Lokpal from time to time. (8) The Vigilance Officers and the Chief Vigilance Officer shall have powers to enquire and impose penalties under CCS Conduct Rules in such cases and as per such rules as laid down by the Lokpal from time to time. 23. Staff of Lokpal, etc.- (1) There shall be such officers and employees as may be prescribed to assist the Lokpal in the discharge of their functions under this Act. (2) The number and categories of officers and employees shall be decided by the Lokpal. (3) The categories, recruitment and conditions of service of the officers and employees referred Provided that no official, whose integrity is in doubt, shall be considered for being posted in (4) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (5) The officers and other employees referred to in sub-section (1) shall be under the (6) Lokpal shall have the powers to choose its own officials. Lokpal may enlist officials on (7) The staff and officers shall be entitled to such pay scales and other allowances, which may be (8) Lokpal shall be competent to increase or decrease its staff at various levels, within its overall 24. Repeal and savings – (1) The Central Vigilance Commission Act shall stand repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal, any act or thing done under the said Act shall be deemed to have been done under this Act and may be continued and completed under the corresponding provisions of this Act. (3) All enquiries and investigations and other disciplinary proceedings pending before the Central Vigilance Commission and which have not been disposed of, shall stand transferred to and be continued by the Lokpal as if they were commenced before him under this Act. (4) Notwithstanding anything contained in any Act, the posts of the Secretary and other Officers and Employees of the Central Vigilance Commission are hereby abolished and they are hereby appointed as the Secretary and other officers and employees of the Lokpal. The salaries, allowances and other terms and conditions of services of the said Secretary, officers and other employees shall, until they are varied, be the same as to which they were entitled to immediately before the commencement of this Act. (5) All vigilance administration under the control of all Departments of Central Government, Ministries of the Central Government, corporations established by or under any Central Act, Government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by the Central Government shall stand transferred, along with its personnel, assets and liabilities to Lokpal for all purposes. (6) The personnel working in vigilance wings of the agencies mentioned in sub-section (5) shall be deemed to be on deputation to Lokpal for a period of five years from the date they are transferred to Lokpal. However, Lokpal may decide to repatriate any one of them anytime. (7) That Department from where any personnel have been transferred to Lokpal under sub-section (5), shall cease to have any control over the administration and functions of transferred personnel. (8) Lokpal shall rotate the personnel and create vigilance wing of each department in such a way that no personnel from the same department get posted for vigilance functions in the same department. (9) No person shall be employed with Lokpal against whom any vigilance enquiry or any criminal case is pending at the time of being considered. 25. Investigation Wing of Lokpal: (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 17 of Prevention of Corruption Act, such officers of Investigation wing, upto the level as decided by Lokpal, shall have, in relation to the investigation and arrest of persons throughout India, in connection with investigation of complaints under this Act, all the powers, duties, privileges and liabilities which members of Delhi Special Police Establishment have in connection with the investigation of offences committed therein. (3) That part of Delhi Special Police Establishment, in so far as it relates to investigation and prosecution of offences alleged to have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, shall stand transferred, along with its employees, assets and liabilities to Lokpal for all purposes. (4) That part of Delhi Special Police Establishment, which has been transferred under sub-section (3), shall form part of Investigation Wing of Lokpal. (5) The Central Government shall cease to have any control over the transferred part and its personnel. (6) The salaries, allowances and other terms and conditions of services of the personnel transferred under sub-section (3) shall be the same as to which they were entitled to immediately before the commencement of this Act. (7) All cases which were being dealt by that part of Delhi Special Police Establishment, which has been transferred under sub-section (3), shall stand transferred to Lokpal. (8) After completion of investigation in any case, the investigation wing shall present the case to an appropriate bench of Lokpal, which shall decide whether to grant permission for prosecution or not. 25A. Provided that in certain category of cases, as prescribed by Lokpal, the permission to prosecute or deny shall be taken by a bench of Lokpal. Provided further that the prosecution wing shall decide whether to prosecute or not within a fortnight of receipt of a case from investigation wing, else prosecution wing shall be deemed to have decided to initiate prosecution. 26. Complaints against officers or employees of Lokpal: (1) Complaints against employees or officers of Lokpal shall be dealt with separately and as per provisions of this section. (2) Such complaint could relate to an allegation of an offence punishable under Prevention of Corruption Act or misconduct or a dishonest enquiry or investigation. (3) As soon as such a complaint is received, the same shall be displayed on the website of Lokpal, Provided that if the complainant so desires, his identity shall be protected. (4) Investigations into each such complaint shall be completed within a month of its receipt. (5) In addition to examining the allegations against the said official, the allegations shall especially be examined against sections 107, 166, 167, 177, 182, 191, 192, 196, 199, 200, 201, 202, 204, 217, 218, 219, 463, 464, 468, 469, 470, 471, 474 of Indian Penal Code. (6) If, during the course of investigations, it is felt that the charges are likely to be sustained, such officer shall be divested of all his responsibilities and powers and shall be placed under suspension. (7) If after completion of enquiry or investigations, it is decided to prosecute that person under Provided further that order under this clause shall be passed within 15 days of completion of (8) A three member bench shall hear the cases of complaints against its staff and employees. However, for officers of the level of Chief Vigilance Officer or above, the hearings shall be done by full bench of Lokpal. (9) Lokpal shall take all steps to ensure that all enquiries and investigations on complaints against its own staff and officials are conducted in most transparent and honest manner. 27. Protection- (1) No suit, prosecution, or other legal proceedings shall lie against the Chairperson or members or against any officer, employee, agency or person referred to in Section 14(4) in respect of anything which is in good faith done while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duties under this Act. (2) No proceedings of the Lokpal shall be held to be bad for want of form and except on the ground of jurisdiction, no proceedings or decision of the Lokpal shall be liable to be challenged, reviewed, quashed or called in question in any court of ordinary Civil Jurisdiction. Miscellaneous 28. Public Servants to submit property statements- (1) Every public servant, other than those mentioned in Section 2(12)(a) to (c), shall within three months after the commencement of this Act and thereafter before the 30th June of every year submit to the head of that public authority, in the form prescribed by Lokpal, a statement of his assets and liabilities and those of the members of his family. Public servants mentioned in sections 2(12)(a) to (c) shall submit their returns in a format prescribed by the Lokpal, which shall include their sources of incomes, to the Lokpal with the aforesaid time lines. (2) The Head of each public authority shall ensure that all such statements are put on the website by 31st August of that year. (3) If no such statement is received by the Head of that public authority from any such public servant within the time specified in sub-section (1), the Head of that public authority shall direct the concerned public servant to do so immediately. If within next one month, the public servant concerned does not submit such statement, the Head shall stop the salary and allowances of that public servant till he submits such statement. Explanation- In this section "family of a public servant" means the spouse and such children and (4) The Lokpal may initiate prosecution against such public servant under Section 176 IPC. 28A. Properties deemed to have been obtained through corrupt means: (1) If any property, moveable or immoveable, is subsequently found to be owned by the public servant or any of his family members, which had not been declared under this section by that public servant and which was acquired before filing of last return under this section, the same shall be deemed to have been obtained through corrupt means. (2) If any property, moveable or immoveable, is subsequently found to be in possession of the public servant or any of his family members, which had not been declared under this section by that public servant, the same shall be deemed to be owned by that public servant and the same shall be deemed to have been acquired through corrupt means by that public servant, the onus of proving otherwise shall be on the public servant. (3) The public servant shall be given an opportunity to explain, within 15 days, (a) in the case of properties under sub-section (1) of this section, whether he had disclosed that (b) in the case of properties under sub-section (2) of this section, to explain why these (4) If public servant fails to provide satisfactory reply under sub-section (3) of this section with respect to some properties, Lokpal shall immediately confiscate all such properties. (5) Transfer of those properties for which notices are issued under sub-section (3) of this section, shall be deemed to be null and void after the date of issue of such notices. (6) Lokpal shall intimate such information to the Income Tax Department for appropriate action. (7) Appeal against the orders of Lokpal shall lie in High Court of appropriate jurisdiction, which shall decide the matter within three months of filing of the appeal. Provided that no appeal shall be entertained after expiry of 30 days from the date of order of Lokpal under sub-section (4). (8) All properties confiscated under this section shall be auctioned to highest bidder. Half of the Provided that if an appeal has been filed in any case, the auction shall not take place till the disposal of appeal. 28B. (2) For an allegation against a Member of Parliament that he has taken a bribe for any conduct in Parliament, including voting in Parliament or raising question in Parliament or any other matter, a complaint could be made to the Speaker of Lok Sabha or the Chairperson of Rajya Sabha, depending upon the House to which that member belongs. Such complaints shall be dealt in the following manner: 29. Power to delegate and assign functions: (1) Lokpal shall be competent to delegate its powers and assign functions to the officials working in Lokpal. Provided that the following functions shall be performed by the benches and cannot be delegated: (i) Granting permission to initiate prosecution in any case. (ii) Order for dismissal of any government servant under CCS Conduct Rules. (iii) Passing orders under section 10 on complaints against officials and staff of Lokpal. (iv) Pass orders in cases of complaints, other than grievances, against officers of the level of Joint 30. Time limits: (1) Preliminary enquiry under sub-section (1) of section 9 of this Act should be Provided that the enquiry officer shall be liable for an explanation if the enquiry is not completed within this time limit. (2) Investigation into any allegation shall be completed within six months, and in any case, not more than one year, from the date of receipt of complaint. (3) Trial in any case filed by Lokpal should be completed within one year. Adjournments should be 30A. Transparency and application of Right to Information Act: (1) Lokpal shall make every effort to put every information on its website. (2) Once investigation or enquiry is complete in any case, all records related to that case shall be 31. Penalty for certain types of complaints- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, if (2) Such fines shall be recoverable as dues under Land Revenue Act. (3) A complaint or allegation once made under this Act shall not be allowed to be withdrawn. 31A. Preventive measures: (1) Lokpal shall, at regular intervals, either study itself or cause to be studied (2) Lokpal shall also be responsible for creating awareness about this Act and involving general public in curbing corruption. 31B. Reward Scheme: (1) Lokpal shall encourage complainants from within and outside the government to report and fight against corruption by publicly recognizing such persons. (2) Lokpal shall also prepare an appropriate scheme to give financial award to such complainants. Provided that the total value of such reward shall not exceed 10% of the value of property confiscated or loss prevented. 32. Power to make Rules – (1) The Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules Provided that such rules shall be made only in consultation and with the approval of Lokpal. (2A) Lokpal shall also be competent to make its own rules for the proper functioning of Lokpal. (iii) procedure for registration of cases at Lokpal and initiation of prosecution (3) Any rule made under this Act may be made with retrospective effect and when such a rule is made the reasons for making the rule shall be specified in a Statement laid before both Houses of the Parliament. (4) Lokpal shall strictly adhere to the time limits mentioned at various places in this Act. In order to achieve that, Lokpal shall lay down work norms for each level of functionaries and make an assessment of the additional number of functionaries and budget required in accordance with workload. 32A. 33. Removal of difficulties- Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the President, in 34. Power to make regulations: 35. This Act shall override the provisions of all other laws. Incoming search terms:jan lokpal bill draft (1),Related posts:
|
| Jalila Essaidi-Bulletproof Skin: Jalila Essaidi Create Bulletproof Skin By Using Spider-Goat Silk Posted: 22 Aug 2011 02:05 AM PDT A BIO-ART task to conceive bulletproof skin has granted a Utah investigator even more wish his genetically-engineered arachnid fine gist can be utilised to assist surgeons mend large cuts and conceive artificial tendons and ligaments. Researcher Randy Lewis and his collaborators profited worldwide vigilance lately when they discovered a commercially viable way to construct fine gist fibres utilising goats and silkworms that had arachnid genes injected into their makeup. Spider fine gist is one of the strongest fibres renowned and five times more powerful than steel. Professor Lewis’s fibres are not that powerful, but are much more powerful than fine gist rotated by commonplace worms. With Prof Lewis’s assist, Dutch creative individual Jalila Essaidi undertook an trial weaving a lattice of human skin units and fine gist that was adept of halting projectiles discharged at decreased speeds. “Randy and I were shifted by the identical propel I believe, curiousness about the conclusion of the project,” Essaidi said. “Both the creative individual and researcher are inherently inquisitive beings.” Prof Lewis considered the task was a bit off the partition at the start, Essaidi acknowledged. “But in the end, what inquisitive individual can state no to a task like this?” she said. Essaidi, who utilised a European genetics-in-art allocate to finance her task at the Designers & Artists 4 Genomics Awards, primarily liked to use Prof Lewis’s arachnid fine gist from goats to capitalise on the “grotesque factor” of the mammal-spider combination. But Prof Lewis didn’t yet have sufficient of the arachnid goat fine gist to drive hundreds of backyards to Essaidi. So he dispatched her spools of fine gist from silkworms he had genetically engineered in a latest tendency alike to the goats. Essaidi primarily proposed to blaze .22 calibre projectiles at the “skin” extended in a frame. But she determined to location the “skin” on a exceptional gelatin impede utilised at the Netherlands Forensic Institute. Using a high-speed camera, she displayed a projectile discharged at a decreased pace piercing the skin woven with an commonplace worm’s fine gist But when checked with Lewis’ genetically engineered worm’s fine gist grafted between the epidermis and dermis, the skin didn’t break. Neither fine gist was adept to repel a projectile discharged at usual pace from a .22 calibre rifle. “We were more than a little shocked that the last skin kept the projectile from going in there,” Prof Lewis said of the checks at decreased speed. “It still completed up 2 inches into the torso, so it would not have kept your life. But without a question the most stimulating part for us is the detail that they were adept to recreate the skin on peak of our fibres. It’s certain thing we haven’t done. Nobody has worked in that area.” Essaidi was intrigued by the notion of arachnid fine gist as armour, and liked to display that security in its broadest sense is a relation notion, therefore bulletproof. “If human skin would be adept to make this gist, would we be defended from bullets?” she marvelled on her blog. “I desire to discover the communal, political, ethical and heritage matters surrounding security in a world with get access to to new biotechnologies.” She said it is legend that Achilles was invulnerable in all of his body except for his heel. “Will we in the beside future due to biotechnology no longer require to descend from a godly bloodline in alignment to have traits like invulnerability?” she asked. Prof Lewis downplayed the promise bulletproof submissions of his research. “I absolutely would not discount that, but I don’t glimpse that as a marvellous submission at the moment,” he said. He said bulletproof vests currently exist. But being adept to augment units and use the material to restore large allowances of human skin could be important for surgeons seeking to cover large cuts, or heal persons with critical burns. He said the material’s power and elasticity would endow medical practitioners to cover large localities without being concerned about it tearing out — a large-scale benefit over little skin grafts. Prof Lewis couldn’t give a time border for such a use because it would need FDA approval. But he wanted to manage some animal checking inside two years, and documented arachnid fine gist currently has verified very matching with the human body. The next step is to develop more material to check what units will augment on it — made simpler with the “transgenic” fine gist worms and milk from goat spiders. The genuine stuff is still the holy grail for fibres and textiles but not the easiest to arrive by as evidenced by an 11-by-4 base tapestry revealed two years before at the New York Museum of Natural History that took millions of arachnids to complete. “We understand some skin units will augment (on our fibres), but can we get units that make ligaments and tendons grow,” Prof Lewis said. He said it may be simpler to use the genetically engineered fine gist to make components better than genuine ligaments or tendons. Essaidi, meantime, said she has abounding of untamed concepts but likes to transplant the bulletproof skin. She said Geert Verbeke, controller of Verbeke Foundation in Belgium, the large-scale Eco/BioArt repository, likes to wear the skin “as an ode to BioArt”. Back at Utah State’s bio-manufacturing facility in Logan, Utah, Prof Lewis just begun breeding for the next around of milking in January. He has about three dozen of the genetically-engineered goats and extracts proteins from the exceptional milk, then rotates them in a way that replicates the spider’s procedure, producing in a powerful, light-weight fibre. “Nothing is as powerful as the natural fibre, yet,” Prof Lewis said of arachnid silk. “But we are employed on explaining that problem.” Incoming search terms:bulletproof skin (1), jalila essaidi nude (1),Related posts:
|
| K V Kamath Infosys: New Chairmen Of Infosys K V Kamath Takes Charge on Monday Posted: 22 Aug 2011 12:16 AM PDT K V Kamath, 64, is going to make annals on Monday, by taking ascribe as the first non-founder head individual of Infosys in its three-decade history. Also, the non-executive head individual of ICICI Bank, he has been a board constituent of Infosys since 2007, as an unaligned director. Besides, from today, S (‘Kris’) Gopalakrishnan becomes boss co-chairman of Infosys, producing way for another co-founder, S D Shibulal, as organising controller and head boss officer. This is the first foremost change of guard at India’s second biggest data expertise services business, in the awaken of the retirement of co-founder and head individual, N R Narayana Murthy, last week. For Gopalakrishnan and Shibulal, the last two of seven initial co-founders left with the business, the new functions would need unaligned conclusion producing in the nonattendance of Murthy. It would be the first time that Kamath, an established title in the banking world, would seating the board of a expertise company. He is furthermore anticipated to mentor the next lifetime of leaders. “My function has been characterised to gaze after business governance and confirm there is correct designing to find the right persons in the administration for giving responsibilities with the development of the company,” Kamath had notified Business Standard in a latest interview. In his new function, he would be supplied with an agency at Building-1 of Infosys’ head agency in the Electronic City campus in Bengaluru. He has another agency in the town supplied by ICICI Bank. Building-1 is the administrative headquarters’ impede of Infosys. Despite the change in their profiles, Gopalakrishnan and Shibulal would extend to live at the sleeping rooms supplied to them in their previous roles. They share a widespread seminar auditorium, with a doorway of their respective sleeping rooms attached to it. Gopalakrishnan, who will be to blame for organising large purchasers, is anticipated to journey extensively in the new role. He would start with a journey to Europe for a week, said highly put sources. Related posts:
|
| You are subscribed to email updates from GaTaGaT Highlights To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment